Partenweederei, Ms Belgrano, and Rudolph A. Oetker v. George Weigel, Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Company v. Partenweederei, Ms Belgrano, and Rudolph A. Oetker

313 F.2d 423 PARTENWEEDEREI, MS BELGRANO, and Rudolph A. Oetker, Appellants, v. George WEIGEL, Appellee. BRADY-HAMILTON STEVEDORE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PARTENWEEDEREI, MS BELGRANO, and Rudolph A. Oetker, Appellees. No. 17178. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Dec. 11, 1962. Wood, Wood, Tatum, Mosser & Brooke, and Erskine B. Wood, Portland, Or., for appellants-appellees Partenweederei, MS Belgrano, and Rudolph A. Oetker. Gray, Fredrickson & Heath, and Nathan J. Heath, Portland, Or., for appellant Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co. Pozzi, Levin & Wilson, and Philip A. Levin, Portland, Or., for appellee George Weigel. Before JERTBERG, KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Following our decision in this matter (Partenweederei, MS Belgrano v. Weigel, 299 F.2d 897 , February 8, 1962), Shipowners petitioned for a rehearing, on the ground that they were entitled to judgment against Stevedore for indemnity for the expenses incurred, both here and in the District Court, in sucessfully defending the libel. We granted the petition for rehearing and thereafter vacated the portion of our judgment reversing the decree of indemnity, and the submission of the matter…