Greene

Greene v. Prunty

Good Law
938 F. Supp. 637·1996 WL 492140·1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18825
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 1996CV 94-1516 BTM (LSP)California1,805 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moskowitz, J.

ORDER TO SUBMIT AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM AND SETTING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Herbert Greene, has brought a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Officer Konkel of the Calipatria State Prison. Plaintiff Greene, an inmate at Calipatria, has moved the Court for an order, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1651 (a) and 2241(e)(5), granting his request for writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum directing the production of inmate-witnesses at trial, two of which are incarcerated outside of this district. The defendant opposes this motion.

DISCUSSION

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (c)(5), in conjunction with 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (a), permits a federal court, when necessary, to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. The purpose of this writ is to direct the custodian of a prisoner to produce the prisoner for appearance as a witness in court. The decision to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum is committed to the discretion of the district court. See Atkins v. City of New York, 856 F.Supp. 755, 757 (E.D.N.Y.1994).

A. Jurisdictional Concerns

The power of the district courts to issue writs of habeas corpus ad…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.