United States v. Reiten

Good Law
313 F.2d 673·6 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 281·1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6309
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 196317440California1,301 words

Opinion

Opinion

313 F.2d 673 UNITED STATES of America for the Use of C. W. ATKINS, d/b/a Atkins Welding Shop, Appellant, v. B. H. REITEN and Leonard Stewart, Partners, d/b/a Reiten & Stewart Construction Company, and Continental Casualty Company, a corporation, Appellees. No. 17440. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. January 28, 1963. Bell, Sanders & Tallman, and James K. Tallman, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellant. John E. Manders, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellee. Before MERRILL, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. BROWNING, Circuit Judge. 1 Before a contract for the construction of a public work of the United States is awarded, the contractor must furnish a payment bond with surety "for the protection of all persons supplying * * * material in the prosecution of the work." 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a(a)(2) (Section 1(a) (2) of the Miller Act). And "Every person who has furnished * * * material in the prosecution of the work * * * and who has not been paid in full therefor before the expiration of a period of ninety days after the day on which the last of the * * * material was furnished * * * by him for which such claim is made, shall have the right to sue on such payment bond…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.