In Re Calestini

Good Law
321 F. Supp. 1313·1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14886
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 1971B 70 3241California1,585 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peckham, J.

ORDER

This case is before the Court on a petition to review a turnover order of the Referee in Bankruptcy. Petitioner is an attorney who had instituted, on behalf of the bankrupt, a personal injury action in the state courts. This state court suit was begun prior to the adjudication of petitioner’s client as bankrupt. The Trustee sought to have the petitioner appointed as special counsel for the Trustee in prosecuting the civil action on the theory that title to the cause of action had vested in the Trustee. Petitioner resisted, claiming that the Trustee had no rights in the personal injury action and had no powers with regard to the attorney-client relationship between petitioner and bankrupt. The Trustee then filed an application for a turnover order, and, following hearing, the Referee ordered that petitioner turn over to the Trustee all legal files relating to the personal injury action. Petitioner has refused to comply since he takes the position that, the summary jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court does not extend to this situation. Petitioner then filed this petition for review.

Two questions must be decided:

1. Is an action for personal injuries “property” of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.