H. G. Maison v. Confederated Tribes Of The Umatilla Indian Reservation

Good Law
314 F.2d 169·1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6125
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 196317139_1California2,869 words

Opinion

Opinion

314 F.2d 169 H. G. MAISON, Individually and as Superintendent, Dept. of State Police of the State of Oregon, et al., Appellants, v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF the UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION et al., Appellees. No. 17139. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. February 15, 1963. Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen. of Oregon, Arthur G. Higgs and Roy C. Atchison, Asst. Attys. Gen., Salem, Or., for appellant. Frank E. Nash, Mark C. McClanahan, King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, Portland, Or., for appellees. Before HAMLIN, MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge. 1 This case involves fishing rights of the Confederated Tribes of the Walla Walla, Cayuse and Umatilla Indians under a treaty with the United States. 2 The District Court had jurisdiction under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1331 , relating to federal questions, and 28 U.S.C. § 2201 , the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act. The provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2281 , requiring a three-judge court are not applicable and trial was properly had before a single judge. 1 Jurisdiction is conferred upon this court under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 3 It appears that late in May of 1855 a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.