Department of Finance v. Commission on State Mandates

Good Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 237·2003 Cal. LEXIS 3353·2003 Daily Journal DAR 5463·30 Cal. 4th 727·68 P.3d 1203
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 22, 2003S109219California11,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

George, J.

Article XIII B, section 6, of the California Constitution provides: “Whenever the Legislature or any state agency mandates a new program or higher level of service on any local government, the State shall provide a subvention of funds to reimburse such local government for the costs of such program or increased level of service . . . .” (Hereafter article XIII B, section 6.)

Real parties in interest—two public school districts and a county (hereafter claimants)—participate in various education-related programs that are funded by the state and, in some instances, by the federal government. Each of these underlying funded programs in turn requires participating public school districts to establish and utilize specified school councils and advisory committees. Statutory provisions enacted in the mid-1990’s require that such school councils and advisory committees provide notice of meetings, and post agendas for those meetings. (See Gov. Code, § 54952; Ed. Code, § 35147.) We granted review to determine whether claimants have a right to reimbursement from the state for their costs in complying with these statutory notice and agenda requirements.

We conclude, contrary to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.