Nakahara

People v. Nakahara

Bad Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 223·2003 Cal. LEXIS 3354·2003 Daily Journal DAR 5457·30 Cal. 4th 705·68 P.3d 1190
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 22, 2003S018292California6,683 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chin, J.

Defendant Evan Teek Nakahara appeals from a judgment of the Los Angeles County Superior Court imposing the death penalty following his conviction of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187), burglary (§ 459), and robbery (§211), accompanied by special circumstance findings that he committed the murder while lying in wait (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(15)), and while engaged in the commission of burglary (id., former subd. (a)(17)(i)) and robbery (id., former subd. (a)(17)(vii)). The jury also found defendant used a firearm (§§ 1203.06, 12022.5) but was not personally armed (§ 12022) during these crimes. Defendant’s appeal is automatic. (§ 1239, subd. (b).) As will appear, we will affirm the judgment in its entirety.

I. Facts

Defendant and Michael Rojas were jointly charged with murdering Beatrice Viveiros on July 11, 1989. The trial court ordered the cases severed for trial. The evidence in the present case showed that defendant had been dating Viveiros for several years, and had admired a gun collection owned by her father. Defendant had earlier joked with his friend Edwin Skinner about planning to steal the guns and “doing away” with Viveiros after the theft. On the day of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.