Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior Court

Bad Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 222·2004 Cal. LEXIS 2546·2004 Daily Journal DAR 3685·32 Cal. 4th 771·86 P.3d 290
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2004S098817California6,900 words

Opinion

Opinion

Werdegar, J.

We granted review in this matter to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeal as to whether the procedural prerequisites to seeking punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, codified at Code of Civil Procedure section 425.13, subdivision (a) (section 425.13(a)), apply to punitive damage claims in actions alleging elder abuse subject to heightened civil remedies under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15600 et seq.) (Elder Abuse Act or Act). The Court of Appeal concluded section 425.13(a) does not apply. We agree, finding nothing in the text, legislative history, or purposes of either section 425.13(a) or the Elder Abuse Act to suggest the Legislature intended to afford health care providers that act as elder custodians, and that egregiously abuse the elders in their custody, the special protections against exemplary damages they enjoy when accused of negligence in providing health care. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Background

Lourdes M. Inclan and Juan C. Inclan (plaintiffs) sued Covenant Care California, Inc., and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.