Francis L. Sauget v. Herbert J. Johnston

Good Law
315 F.2d 816·7 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 986·1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5607
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 196318002California804 words

Opinion

Opinion

Orr, J.

On or about the 28th day of January 1954, appellant and appellee entered into-a written joint venture agreement and pursuant thereto, conducted business operations.

Disagreements arose and appellee in-situted suit for dissolution of the joint venture and an accounting. Issues were joined and the case went to trial. During the course of the trial, appellee introduced a copy of the joint venture agreement, which the trial court admitted as being “an exact copy of the original.”

The trial court ordered an accounting and referred the cause to a special master, who in due time made his report. Over the objection of the appellant, the master’s report was accepted by the trial court; and judgment was entered in favor of appellee. On appeal here appellant assigns as error: (1) the admission in evidence of an alleged copy of the joint venture agreement; (2) the acceptance by the trial court of the master’s findings of fact and the adoption by the court of his report; and (3) the determination that the applicable statute of limitations had not run.

As to the first assignment of error, it is claimed that a copy of the agreement was admitted in evidence in violation of the best evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.