Bach

Bach v. State Bar

Good Law
1991 Cal. LEXIS 831·278 Cal. Rptr. 371·52 Cal. 3d 1201·91 Daily Journal DAR 2535·805 P.2d 325
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1991S014148California2,337 words

Opinion

Opinion

We review the recommendation of the State Bar Court that petitioner John Nicholas Bach, admitted to practice in 1964, be suspended from the practice of law for 12 months, that execution of the suspension be stayed, that petitioner be placed on probation for that period and that he be actually suspended for the first 30 days and until proof is made of restitution of certain unearned fees. We conclude that the evidence supports the State Bar’s findings and conclusions, and adopt the disciplinary recommendations.

I. Procedural Background

Following three days of hearings, a State Bar referee concluded that petitioner had repeatedly and with reckless disregard failed to perform legal services competently for one of his clients in an uncontested marital dissolution proceeding by failing over a period of two and a half years to pursue the case to a conclusion; that he had failed to communicate with his client over much of that time; had withdrawn his representation without the client’s consent or court approval; and had failed to refund unearned fees paid to him in advance. The referee further found that petitioner violated provisions of the Business and Professions Code in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.