Lawhorn

Lawhorn v. State Bar

Good Law
1987 Cal. LEXIS 452·240 Cal. Rptr. 848·43 Cal. 3d 1357·743 P.2d 908
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 29, 1987S.F. 25099California4,326 words

Opinion

Opinion

The Review Department of the State Bar Court recommended, with two members dissenting, that petitioner Victor R. Lawhorn be disbarred from the practice of law for mishandling client funds. Although petitioner was charged with and found to have committed four violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, all arose from the same transaction between petitioner (a relatively inexperienced attorney) and his client. In these circumstances, and taking into account mitigating factors in the case, we conclude that disbarment would be excessive discipline and that petitioner should instead be placed on probation for five years with a two-year term of actual suspension.

Background

Petitioner was admitted to practice in this state in November 1978. This is his first and only disciplinary matter.

In September 1982, petitioner, who concentrated on the practice of immigration law, was retained by Karen Ann Gayles to represent her in a claim for damages arising from an automobile accident. A written retainer agreement provided that petitioner would receive one-third of any recovery as his fee, in addition to reimbursement of any costs advanced.

In May 1983, Gayles agreed to accept…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.