Newhouse

Newhouse v. Board of Osteopathic Examiners

Good Law
159 Cal. App. 2d 728·1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 2062·324 P.2d 687
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 1958Civ. 22359California2,952 words

Opinion

Opinion

Herndon, J.

Petitioner and appellant, a physician and surgeon licensed by the State Board of Osteopathic Examiners, was found guilty of unprofessional conduct in proceedings before the board and petitioner’s license and certificate to practice was suspended for a period of 30 days. Pursuant to section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, appellant petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate annulling the order of the board. An alternative writ issued, and the matter was heard on the record of the proceedings before the respondent board, including the accusation and exhibits introduced in that proceeding. Petitioner appeals from the ensuing judgment dissolving the alternative writ and denying his petition for a peremptory writ.

The charging portion of the accusation recites: “That on or about January 15, 1956, at Los Angeles, California, respondent [appellant here] did aid or abet William S. Hendricks in suturing the person of patient Eva Batiste, a practice of a system or mode of treating the sick or afflicted for which the said William S. Hendricks was not licensed by the State of California, the said William S. Hendricks not having at the time of so doing, a valid unrevoked…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.