Roach

Miller v. Roach

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 2d 427·1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 73·59 P.2d 418
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 13, 1936Civ. 1916California1,251 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turrentine, J.

Emma Roach executed a note secured by mortgage on real estate for $5,800 to the plaintiff, Olive Miller. Thereafter, she and the defendants Weber entered into “exchange escrow instructions” wherein it was agreed that “for the purpose of effecting an exchange of properties hereinafter described”, which “exchange escrow instructions” was made for the purpose, among other things, of exchanging the property which was the security on the notes and mortgage to the plaintiff. The escrow instructions then set forth “its [the property’s] appraised value and the value of the equity conveyed”. The agreement or “exchange escrow instructions” provided that the property was “subject to: mtg. for $5,800, at 8 per cent quarterly, due about 1928 in favor of Olive Miller. Appraisal value $28,800.00. Value of equity $17,534.67.”- The “exchange escrow instructions” providing for the exchange of the property from the Webers to Roach was in identical form except as to the names, descriptions and figures; the “value of equity” in each instance was substantially the same, any difference being adjusted between the parties. The “exchange escrow instructions” also provided that “assurance of title” should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.