Canfield

Canfield v. Scripps

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 2d 642·1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 113·59 P.2d 1040
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 27, 1936Civ. 10621California2,246 words

Opinion

Opinion

Roth, J.

Alice L. Canfield, plaintiff and appellant herein, is the executrix of the estate of Byron Hilton Canfield, deceased, and was appointed as such by the superior court of this state, in and for the County of Santa Barbara. She was preceded as the legal and official representative of said estate by E. G. Dodge, special administrator, who had been previously appointed by the same court. This action is one whereby plaintiff seeks damages for conversion of stock belonging to the testate, for which conversion she alleges the defendants are responsible.

During his lifetime, deceased pledged the stock in question with E. W. Scripps, trustee, as security for the payment of certain notes in favor of certain of the other defendants. The notes were not paid and approximately eight months after the death of the plaintiff’s testate, notice having been given of such purpose to Dodge, special administrator, and others, E. W. Scripps, as trustee, commenced proceedings to sell the stock as a pledge in the state of Washington, which was the domicile of Scripps and the situs of the stock. Prior to the sale, so noticed, Dodge, special administrator, together with others (including a special…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.