Leitch

Leitch v. Gay

Good Law
1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 1015·64 Cal. App. 2d 16·147 P.2d 631
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 20, 1944Civ. 12577California1,611 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action to obtain a decree enforcing a trust as to certain moneys alleged to be held by Dorothy Wilson Gay as the administratrix of the estate of her father, Homer Wilson. The trial court made findings in favor of the defendant. From the judgment entered thereon the plaintiff has appealed.

The controversy arose out of the following facts. Heretofore Jeanne Queirolo was the owner of some quartz mining claims in Mariposa County known as Lafayette and Lafayette Extension. She entered into a contract with Homer Wilson under the terms of which the latter was entitled to enter and operate said mines and, according to the terms of the contract, to purchase said mines. That contract was made on the 5th day of October, 1935. Thereafter Homer Wilson transferred to this plaintiff, E. H. Leitch, an undivided one- half interest in said contract. It soon transpired that they did not have sufficient moneys to operate the mine and they entered into negotiations with Mrs. Irene Van de Carr. Later she, together with C. L. Duncan, agreed to take over the claims and operate the same. A formal contract was made with her. She failed to keep her agreement and the plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.