Laisne

People v. Laisne

Good Law
163 Cal. App. 2d 554·1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1538·329 P.2d 725
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 1958Crim. 2851California1,257 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peek, J.

By information defendant was charged with a violation of section 702 of the Welfare and Institutions Code in that he sold intoxicating liquor to a minor, thereby tending to cause the minor to lead an idle, dissolute, lewd and immoral life. The case was submitted on the record of the preliminary hearing supplemented by written argument of counsel. From the judgment of conviction which was thereafter entered, defendant appeals contending (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment, and (2) that the court erred in excluding certain testimony and exhibits.

The record shows that on the evening of December 24, 1956, James, the minor, attended a party at a friend’s home at which several persons between the ages of 16 and 20 were present. It was decided that some liquor should be obtained, and a collection was taken up for that purpose. James, with two other minors, drove to the Chateau Laisne, a bar and restaurant near Mariposa, which was owned and operated by the defendant. James purchased a fifth of vodka, two pints of bourbon and some beer. No request was made by the defendant for any identification, nor did James make any statement relative to his age. After the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.