Foster

Foster v. McConnell

Good Law
162 Cal. App. 2d 701·1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1929·329 P.2d 32
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 1958Civ. 18041California2,685 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bray, J.

Appellant’s petition to the superior court for a writ of mandate to compel respondent Insurance Commissioner to restore his restricted insurance licenses was denied. He appeals.

Questions Presented

1. Was appellant entitled to a trial de novo in the trial court ?

2. Is there substantial evidence to support the findings of the commissioner?

3. Did the commissioner have jurisdiction to discipline appellant for misrepresentations made at Fort Ord, a government reservation?

4. Was there a violation of the United States Constitution or the California Constitution?

Record

Appellant had been licensed as a fire and casualty agent, life and disability agent, and fire and casualty broker. For violations of the Insurance Code all licenses were suspended for two months (from December 14, 1951, to February 13, 1952). At the end of the suspension period and pursuant to section 1690, Insurance Code, the Department of Insurance issued appellant restricted agent’s licenses only. On April 24, 1952, an accusation was filed against appellant charging (1) that during the suspensory period appellant transacted more than 100 policies of insurance with Western Pioneer Insurance Company without a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.