Strosnider

Strosnider v. Superior Court

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 2d 647·1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 634·62 P.2d 1394
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 1936Civ. 5621California1,863 words

Opinion

Opinion

By this writ of prohibition petitioners seek to prevent respondents from proceeding further in an action wherein C. R. Woodruff as receiver of the estates of Harry L. Henry and Clara S. Henry, and Harry L. Henry and Clara S. Henry, individually, are plaintiffs, and Metropolitan Trust Company of California, a corporation, Girlie Strosnider and R. H. Strosnider are defendants, and where plaintiffs, among other things, seek declaratory relief and damages in the sum of $200,000 for violation of a certain contract or agreement.

Very briefly, it appears that the Henrys were indebted to the Strosniders and the trust company upon two promissory notes secured by contracts upon lands near Lake Tahoe in the county of El Dorado. The Henrys were unable to meet their obligations as they became due, and in June, 1933, filed a debtor’s petition under section 74 of the Federal Bankruptcy Act, and thereafter entered into an extension agreement with their creditors, C. E. Woodruff being appointed receiver or custodian.

Thereafter the Henrys defaulted under this extension, and on February 12, 1934, were adjudged bankrupts in the District Court of the United States. Thereafter C. E. Wood-ruff,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.