Murphey v. American Jewish Congress

Bad Law
1936 Cal. LEXIS 699·7 Cal. 2d 712·62 P.2d 374
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 19, 1936L. A. 15511; L. A. 15802California1,574 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Joseph L. Murphey, the surviving husband of decedent, as executor and individually as a legatee, appeals from portions of the decree of distribution. In the first instance, there is an appeal from that portion of the decree firiding and declaring that the American Jewish Congress is not a charitable organization, and, therefore, was entitled to the full sum bequeathed to it by the decedent instead of being compelled to takfe a pro rata portion thereof in order to bring the total bequests to charity to one-third of the distributive value of the estate. The articles of incorporation were introduced in evidence and also oral testimony. Among the purposes for which the corporation was organized are the following:

The oral testimony establishes, without contradiction, that the purposes of the respondent are political. The purposes which we have quoted from the articles confirm the oral testimony and establish beyond question their political character. But that does not conclude the matter. We might have serious doubt of the proper determination of the question were it an open one in this state, particularly in view of Bowditch v. Attorney General, 241 Mass. 168 [ 134 N. E. 796 , 28 A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.