Bennett

Security-First National Bank v. Bennett

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 2d 641·1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 632·62 P.2d 798
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 1936Civ. 11159California1,295 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wood, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in which plaintiff was awarded the balance due on a promissory note secured by a trust deed after a sale of the property given as security.

The action was commenced on August 15, 1933, against seven individual defendants who had signed the note. One of these defendants, William H. Bennett, had died May 4, 1933. Plaintiff presented to Manerva D. Bennett, executrix of the will of William H. Bennett, deceased, on August 8, 1933, its verified claim for the amount for which judgment was rendered. This claim was rejected by the executrix on August 22, 1933. An amended and supplemental complaint was filed on February 9, 1934, in which the death of William H. Bennett was alleged and the presentation and rejection of the claim to the executrix was set forth. It is now contended by defendants that the action is barred by section 714 of the Probate Code, which provides that suits must be brought against the executrix within three months after the date of service of notice of the rejection of the claim. In the case of Gregory v. Clabrough’s Executors, 129 Cal. 475 , [ 62 Pac. 72 ], the action was commenced during the lifetime of the deceased and the point…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.