Reeder

Reeder v. Hoag

Good Law
158 Cal. App. 2d 41·1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 2322·321 P.2d 793
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 1958Civ. 17491California948 words

Opinion

Opinion

Draper, J.

P1aintiff Edna Reeder drove the automobile of her son, Max, from San Lorenzo, to Oakland. She had some difficulty with the brakes and took the car to the service station of defendant Mazzie to have them repaired. Mazzie examined the brake system, determined that the difficulty was in the master cylinder, and told Mrs. Reeder that he would not have time to repair it but would arrange to have the job done by another. He sent the car to de fendant Hoag, who operated a brake repair shop, at about 3 o’clock p. m. Mazzie told Mrs. Reeder to return for the car at 5 p. m., although he knew the job could not be done in two hours. Mrs. Reeder returned for her car at about that time. Mazzie telephoned Hoag who said that he was having trouble with the master cylinder. The car was returned to the service station at about 5:30. Hoag told Mrs. Reeder that the brake system should be gone over completely, that it would work for a while, and that he did not guarantee the brakes. Mazzie’s usual practice was to test cars on which work had been done. He did not cheek this job, but nonetheless told Mrs. Reeder that the car was safe. On her way home, as Mrs. Reeder drove at about 10 miles per hour, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.