California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
11 Cal. 4th 342·1995 Cal. LEXIS 5832·45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 279·95 Daily Journal DAR 13496·902 P.2d 297
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 5, 1995S043694California3,877 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

In this case, we address a conflict in the Courts of Appeal on a recurring issue of substantial fiscal significance to California public entities: does interest on a judgment against a local public entity accrue at the postjudgment interest rate of 10 percent per annum prescribed by section 685.010, subdivision (a), of title 9 of part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or at the rate of 7 percent per annum, pursuant to article XV, section 1, of the California Constitution?

We conclude that section 970.1, subdivision (b), of division 3.6 of title 1 of the Government Code, which provides that “[a] judgment ... is not enforceable under Title 9,” exempts local public entities from title 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Division 3.6 does not, however, itself set a rate of postjudgment interest for claims against the state or local public entities.

Accordingly, pursuant to article XV, section 1, of the California Constitution, “[i]n the absence of the setting of such rate by the Legislature,” the applicable rate of postjudgment interest to be paid by local public entities is 7 percent per annum. The judgment of the Court of Appeal holding otherwise is reversed.

I.

In August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.