Lester

Lester v. Fairbairn

Good Law
1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 371·32 Cal. App. 2d 411·89 P.2d 1091
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 1939Civ. 2424California1,887 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action for a recount of the votes east in an election held in Orange Township, in Orange County. David Fairbairn was declared by the board of supervisors, acting as a canvassing board, to have been elected to the office of justice of the peace of that township by a majority of eight votes. Cal D. Lester brought this action for a recount, as a result of which he was declared to have been elected by a majority of one vote. From the judgment entered Fairbairn has appealed.

While more than 5,000 votes were cast for this office at this election, only a few are here questioned and in these instances the original ballots have been transmitted to this court and are before us.

The first ballot which is questioned is contestant’s “exhibit 19’’, which was counted for Lester. It is very clear that the crosses on this ballot were not made with the stamp provided by the officers, as required by section 1205 of the Political Code. The nature of the stamp provided is apparent from the many other ballots in evidence which, with the exception of the absentee ballots, disclose the form of stamp used. While the crosses on this ballot were made with some form…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.