James Alderson, Surviving Husband and Estate of Clarissa E. Alderson, Deceased, James Alderson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
317 F.2d 790·11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1529·1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5228
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 196318221California3,005 words

Opinion

Opinion

Crary, J.

Petitioners seek review of the decision of the Tax Court, entered May 8, 1962, determining a deficiency in income tax for the taxable year 1957 in the amount of $39,530.58.

The question presented is whether the transactions whereby taxpayers transferred one parcel of realty and acquired another constituted a sale, the gain from which is recognizable under Section 1002 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, or a non-taxable exchange within the meaning of Section 1031 of said Code.

On May 21, 1957, following negotiations between petitioners and Alloy Die Casting Company, hereinafter referred to as Alloy, representatives of petitioners and Alloy executed escrow instructions to the Orange County Title Company, hereinafter referred to as Orange, constituting a purchase and sale agreement whereby petitioners agreed to sell their Buena Park property, consisting of 31.148 acres •of agricultural property, to Alloy for $5,550.00 per acre, a total price of $172,-•871.40. Pursuant to the terms of said agreement, Alloy deposited $17,205.00 in the Orange escrow toward purchase of the Buena Park property.

Some time after the execution of the May 21st escrow petitioners located 115.-32 acres of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.