Ross

County of Alameda v. Ross

Good Law
1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 328·32 Cal. App. 2d 135·89 P.2d 460
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 12, 1939Civ. 6184California3,202 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

The petitioner seeks by means of a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to issue a warrant in payment for materials ordered by the board of supervisors of Alameda County with which to repair a part of the Fruitvale Avenue bridge across the Oakland estuary, which portion of the bridge is used exclusively for the benefit of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company.

The respondent contends there is no valid contract or legal authorization for the County of Alameda to incur or pay the indebtedness for maintaining or repairing that portion of the bridge which is used exclusively for the benefit of a private corporation for the reason that such expenditures constitute a gift of money from the county which is prohibited by law,-and because the license or agreement from the United States for the County of Alameda to use and maintain the bridge is specifically revocable at will and is therefore invalid for lack of mutuality of obligations and is void for lack of consideration.

This proceeding is presented to this court on a written stipulation of facts.

The cities of Oakland and Alameda are both located in Alameda County adjacent to the eastern shore of San Francisco Bay. These cities…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.