Copley

People v. Copley

Good Law
1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 316·32 Cal. App. 2d 74·89 P.2d 160
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 1939Crim. 3182California510 words

Opinion

Opinion

Crail, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of murder in the second degree and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The first contention of the defendant is that there is insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. It is our duty to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the People. It appears that the defendant stabbed the deceased with a long butcher knife which she had brought from her home. At the time of the stabbing he was out in the road attempting to drive away two men who had been guests of the defendant during the evening. After she stabbed him she ran for the automobile in which the guests were waiting. The deceased followed her for a distance of 75 feet or more before he fell down on the road. He was discovered dead several hours later in a pool of his own blood. In our view there is substantial evidence, considering all the facts and circumstances and certain admissions proved to have been made by the defendant, to sustain the verdict.

The defendant’s second contention is that the crime should be reduced to voluntary manslaughter for the reason that malice is a necessary element of murder and there is no proof of malice. In People v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.