Guest

Guest v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
1970 Cal. LEXIS 299·2 Cal. 3d 670·87 Cal. Rptr. 193·470 P.2d 1·35 Cal. Comp. Cases 292
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 18, 1970L.A. 29735California1,276 words

Opinion

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

Petitioner seeks annulment of a decision after reconsideration by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, which held that by reason of the going and coming rule petitioner’s injury was not compensable.

Facts: Petitioner is a policeman employed by the Pomona Police Department. He usually dresses on the job and has a locker at the police station for that purpose. He has two uniforms, one of which he keeps in his locker at work and the other at home.

Petitioner was assigned to perform official duties at the 1968 Los Angeles County Fair. He was instructed to go directly to the fairgrounds each day and not report to the police station first. On September 13, 1968, the opening day for the fair, petitioner, not knowing of any facilities for changing into his uniform at the fairgrounds, put on his full uniform at home and started to drive to the fairgrounds in a car he had borrowed from his brother. While on a direct route between his home and the fairgrounds, he was injured in an automobile accident.

Following an award of benefits to petitioner, the city and the insurance carrier petitioned for reconsideration, which was granted, respondent appeals board holding that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.