Bierlich

Bierlich v. Unger

Good Law
1 Cal. 2d 587·1934 Cal. LEXIS 417·36 P.2d 374
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 2, 1934L. A. 14665California358 words

Opinion

Opinion

Langdon, J.

This action is brought to recover on a surety bond executed by defendant Seaboard Surety Corporation.

Plaintiff, in response to an advertisement of a deed of trust for sale, agreed to lend money to General Finance Corporation. The corporation represented that it had several vacant lots upon which it intended to build. Plaintiff insisted upon a surety bond covering performance. Thereafter plaintiff paid into escrow the amount of his loan, $3,000, and received a note and deed of trust, together with a surety bond, the principals being General Finance Cor poration and defendant Unger, the purported owner of the land. Unger was not in fact the owner, and the building was never constructed. Plaintiff was forced to sell the land under the deed of trust, and suffered a loss, for which he sued and recovered judgment against all defendants. The defendant Seaboard Surety Company appealed.

The only point which requires discussion is the claim of the surety company that it bound itself simply to hold plaintiff harmless and indemnify him against priority of mechanics’ liens, and that it did not guarantee that a building would be constructed. The terms of the bond are entirely clear on this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.