Gaspar Cisneros, Appellant-Petitioner v. United States of America, Appellee-Respondent

Good Law
322 F.2d 948
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 196318490_1California303 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pope, J.

On October 3, 1960, an indictment was returned against Cisneros in the above named district court charging him with conspiring with others to violate § 174 of Title 21 U.S.C. relating to importation, receiving, concealing or otherwise dealing in narcotic drugs which had been imported into the United States. The indictment referred to “Title 21 U.S.C. 174 — conspiracy to violate narcotic laws.” It set forth overt acts pursuant to the conspiracy charged to have been committed on October 22, 1959.

Upon trial Cisneros was found guilty of the offense as charged and he was ■ sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. Thereafter Cisneros sought to have his sentence modified pr corrected by petition filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . The ground assigned for this motion was that the indictment had merely made reference to Title 21 § 174 and did not refer to that section “as amended.”

Prior to the amendment of this section on July 18, 1956, 70 Stat. 570 , § 174 of Title 21, provided for a penalty by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two yea-rs. The 1956 amendment increased the penalty under that section so as to provide for imprisonment from 5 to 20 years. Cisneros contended that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.