22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T48a,MEMORANDUM Shawn Brian Eltringham, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a), (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Eltringham’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief. We have provided Eltringham the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Eltringham’s request for a remand is denied. See United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 633 , 122 S.Ct. 2450 , 153 L.Ed.2d 586 (2002) (“[T]he Constitution does not require the Government to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to entering a plea agreement with a criminal defendant.”). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T4bc,

MEMORANDUM

Shawn Brian Eltringham, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a), (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Eltringham’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief. We have provided Eltringham the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Eltringham’s request for a remand is denied. See United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 633 , 122 S.Ct. 2450 , 153 L.Ed.2d 586 (2002) (“[T]he Constitution does not require the Government to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to entering a plea agreement with a criminal defendant.”).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.