DISCUSSION

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted Garcia's statement for the nonhearsay purpose of explaining the officer's decision not to test for fingerprints. (See People v. Hines (1997) 15 Cal.4th 997, 1047 [out of court statement admissible to prove why officers were called to scene].) We assume Wyatt's contention that "the evidence was never found or pictured or seen" refers to the absence of photographs of the pants and the bicycle, or a reference to the lack of DNA and fingerprint evidence taken from the bag or syringe. Both issues were raised by defense counsel in closing argument and go to the weight of the evidence. We do not reweigh the evidence or reassess the credibility of witnesses. (People v. Albillar (2010) 51 Cal.4th 47, 60.) Wyatt's contention that he did not know of the presence of a controlled substance is contradicted by sufficient evidence from which the jury could infer his knowledge. Wyatt's familiarity with methamphetamine could be inferred from evidence of his prior conviction for possessing it and from the scarring on the inside of Wyatt's left elbow that one of the officer's described as "a scarred-over area of old injection sites." His knowledge of the pants and their contents could be inferred from the fact that he was pushing the bicycle with the bag and from an officer's testimony that the pants would have fit Wyatt and would not have fit Garcia, who was much smaller and carried her own clothes with her in a suitcase. Consciousness of guilt could be inferred from the testimony that Wyatt walked away from the bicycle as soon as he saw a marked police car and that he pushed the bicycle to Garcia when uniformed officers returned.

3 Wyatt's requests to have another attorney review his case is not supported by any facts. We have reviewed the evidence of his prior strike conviction and the entire record. We are satisfied that Wyatt's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P.J.

We concur:

YEGAN, J.

PERREN, J.

4 Charles W. Campbell, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Shea S. Murphy, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Respondent.

5