In re Bianca P CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 2014H038999California4,001 words

Opinion

Opinion

Premo, J.

FACTS

Although the minor never formally admitted to the two charges of forcible lewd or lascivious conduct, the record shows that the parties at times were operating on the assumption that she had committed such conduct. The second amended petition, the operative one here, alleged that the minor was between nine and 12 years old when she molested D.D., a girl younger than she. The second amended petition also alleged that the minor was between 11 and 12 years old when she molested I.D., another younger girl. Although the minor is young, her sexual misconduct had precipitated official interventions. According to one police report, she sexually molested her then six-year- old female cousin I.G. around May or June of 2011. A combination of a prodding by the minor’s younger sister and pornography on a laptop computer caused the minor to engage in sexual activity with I.G. The minor climbed on top of I.G. and asked, “Do you want to do this?” I.G. said, “No.” The minor said, “Okay, I’ll do it.” She rubbed I.G.’s pubic area with her fingers. I.G. said, “Stop it” and yelled for her grandmother. The minor closed the laptop computer and hid the device under the bed, then climbed back on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.