People v. Mouton CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 7, 2014C074926California499 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/7/14 P. v. Mouton CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C074926

v. (Super. Ct. No. 12F01882)

DANIKA DASEA MOUTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Danika Dasea Mouton asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment.

1 I A law enforcement officer conducted a probation search of defendant and found her in possession of a narcotics pipe and a plastic baggie with 12 Percocet pills. Defendant did not have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.