Adamski

Adamski v. Cal. Unempl. Ins. Appeals Bd. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 8, 2014C073501California3,603 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

We summarize the underlying facts from our prior opinion in Adamski. Adamski is the owner and sole shareholder of a corporation, Adamski Construction, Inc., whose business involves building custom homes. On or about March 31, 2008, Adamski finished building a custom “spec” house on High Meadows Trail, and engaged a realtor to sell the house. Thereafter, although Adamski actively looked for work for himself and his corporation, he was unsuccessful in securing employment or work for either, as the new-home construction industry suffered a serious downturn. In September 2008, Adamski filed for unemployment insurance benefits. His application was approved, and he began collecting unemployment benefits.

2 In November 2008, the High Meadows Trail house sold. The Corporation paid Adamski $20,000, which Adamski characterized as a “delayed payment” for the work he had performed on the High Meadows Trail house prior to March 31, 2008; Adamski promptly contacted the Employment Development Department (EDD) to “explain the nature” of the $20,000 payment. Based on Adamski’s representation that he had been unemployed since March 31, 2008, when construction was completed on the High…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.