Ocean's Eleven Casino v. Anders CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 2014D063269California11,505 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/9/14 Ocean’s Eleven Casino v. Anders CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

OCEAN'S ELEVEN CASINO, D063269

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00055763-

CU-DF-NC)

TIM ANDERS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Jacqueline M.

Stern, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions.

The McMillan Law Firm and Scott A. McMillan for Defendant and Appellant.

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Spencer C. Skeen, Tim L. Johnson

and Noam Glick for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Ocean's Eleven Casino (Ocean's Eleven) brought a complaint alleging trade

defamation, among other causes of action, against several…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.