People v. Barfield CA2/7

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent Barfield on appeal. After an examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues. On January 24, 2014 we advised Barfield that he had 30 days to submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not received a response. We have examined the record and are satisfied that Barfield’s attorney on appeal has fully complied with the responsibilities of counsel and that there are no arguable issues. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284 [120 S.Ct. 746, 145 L.Ed.2d 756]; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 118-119; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

SEGAL. J.*

We concur:

WOODS, Acting P. J.

ZELON, J.

* Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

4