Route 66 CPAs v. Glendora Courtyard CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2014B247318California3,733 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 5/13/14 Route 66 CPAs v. Glendora Courtyard CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ROUTE 66 CPAs, LLC, B247318

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KC063544) v.

GLENDORA COURTYARD, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Salvatore T. Sirna, Judge. Affirmed. Mahoney & Soll, Richard A. Soll; LeClair Ryan, James C. Potepan and James C. Hildebrand for Plaintiff and Appellant. John W. Melvin and Tatum R. Everhart for Defendant and Respondent. —————————— Route 66 CPAs LLC (Route 66) appeals the trial court’s denial of its special motion to strike Glendora Courtyard LLC’s (Glendora) cross-complaint pursuant to Code of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.