Rothman

Rothman v. Deshay CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2014B245075California4,517 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/13/14 Rothman v. Deshay CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

BARRY K. ROTHMAN, B245075

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC112957) v.

DAVID DESHAY et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard A. Stone, Judge. Affirmed. Paul Kujawsky for Defendants and Appellants. Law Offices of Barry K. Rothman and Gordon J. Zuiderweg for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_________________________ This appeal arises from an attorney fee dispute between appellants David Deshay, American Trust Deed Services Corporation, Horizon Management, Inc., Horizon Equities, Inc., Horizon Mortgage and Investments Fund, LLC, David…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.