People v. Clark CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2014A136145California2,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

Siggins, J.

Filed 5/13/14 P. v. Clark CA1/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A136145

v. (Sonoma County JAMES MADISON CLARK, JR., Super. Ct. No. SCR-609530) Defendant and Appellant.

In re JAMES CLARK on Habeas Corpus A140603

Defendant James Madison Clark, Jr. was convicted for failure to reregister as a sex offender after being released from incarceration after 30 or more days in prison. (Pen. Code, § 290.015, subd. (a).)1 The court found four prior prison term enhancements to be true (§ 667.5, subd. (b)), including one for a previous section 290.015 offense. The court stayed two of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.