Kim
Kim v. Kim CA2/8
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 5/13/14 Kim v. Kim CA2/8
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
HYUNG CHUL KIM, B245296
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC467489) v.
JAMES KIM et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Amy D. Hogue, Judge. Affirmed.
Peter Beck for Plaintiff and Appellant.
James Kim, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent James Kim.
No appearance for Defendant and Respondent Sunset Cellular, Inc.
______________________________ Hyung Chul Kim (appellant) sued James Kim and Sunset Cellular, Inc. (Sunset Cellular), alleging causes of action under the Labor Code for failure to pay overtime compensation and other…