Kim

Kim v. Kim CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2014B245296California1,911 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/13/14 Kim v. Kim CA2/8

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

HYUNG CHUL KIM, B245296

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC467489) v.

JAMES KIM et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Amy D. Hogue, Judge. Affirmed.

Peter Beck for Plaintiff and Appellant.

James Kim, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent James Kim.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent Sunset Cellular, Inc.

______________________________ Hyung Chul Kim (appellant) sued James Kim and Sunset Cellular, Inc. (Sunset Cellular), alleging causes of action under the Labor Code for failure to pay overtime compensation and other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.