Sanders

Sanders v. Langmuir-Logan CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2014G047997California7,802 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/14/14 Sanders v. Langmuir-Logan CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

NICHOLAS A. SANDERS, as Trustee, etc.,

G047997

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2011-00468519) v.

OPINION

GARFIELD LANGMUIR-LOGAN et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Richard W. Luesebrink, Judge. (Retired judge of the Orange Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed. Logan Law and Rhonda L. Morgan; Everett L. Skillman for Defendants and Appellants. Hicks, Mims, Kaplan & Burns, Robert H. Garretson and Stephen L. Kaplan for Plaintiff and Respondent. After a court trial, the trial judge determined Garfield Langmuir-Logan (Logan) and his limited liability company, Institutional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.