Hemaratanatorn

Hemaratanatorn v. Pasternak CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2014B245701California7,976 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/14/14 Hemaratanatorn v. Pasternak CA2/8

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

ADESORN HEMARATANATORN, B245701

Cross-Complainant and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VC056465)

MICHAEL HELLYAR,

Cross-Defendant and Appellant,

v.

DAVID J. PASTERNAK,

Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Thomas McKnew, Judge. Affirmed.

The Jamison Law Firm and Guy E. Jamison for Cross-Complainant and Appellant, Adesorn Hemaratanatorn.

Michael J. Allison for Cross-Defendant and Appellant, Michael Hellyar.

David J. Pasternak, in pro. per., for Receiver and Respondent. ______________________________ In 2010, the marital dissolution action of Michael and Annette Hellyar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.