City of Dana Point v. Beach Cities Collective CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2014G047839California7,947 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

Filed 5/14/14 City of Dana Point v. Beach Cities Collective CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CITY OF DANA POINT,

G047839

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2010-00352103) v.

OPINION

BEACH CITIES COLLECTIVE, et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Kirk H. Nakamura, Judge. Affirmed. Schwartz Law and Jeffrey M. Schwartz for Defendants and Appellants. Rutan & Tucker, A. Patrick Muñoz, Jennifer Farrell and Alisha Patterson for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * * David Lambert appeals from the trial court’s decision after a bench trial finding the dispensary he operated, Beach Cities Collective (Beach Cities or BCC), did not comply with state medical marijuana law. The trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.