Marriage of Holzman and Seidel CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 2014A136969California5,897 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/15/14 Marriage of Holzman and Seidel CA1/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re the Marriage of STACY HOLZMAN and ALEXANDER SEIDEL.

STACY HOLZMAN,

Appellant, A136969 v. (City & County of San Francisco ALEXANDER SEIDEL, Super. Ct. No. FDI-08-767936) Respondent.

Stacy Holzman (Stacy)1 appeals from the trial court’s ruling in her marital dissolution action with Alexander Seidel (Alex) that a Community Property Agreement (CPA) they signed during the marriage was unenforceable.2 She contends the judgment must be reversed because: (1) the trial court’s statement of decision was deficient for

1 We refer to the parties by their first names, as is customary in family law matters. No…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.