Griffin

Griffin v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 2014D062727California5,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Filed 5/15/14 Griffin v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

GIL GRIFFIN, D062727

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00090876-

CU-OE-CTL)

QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL

LABORATORIES, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Judith F.

Hayes, Judge. Affirmed.

Mirch Law Firm, Kevin J. Mirch, Marie C. Mirch, and Erin E. Hanson for Plaintiff

and Appellant.

Baker & McKenzie, Colin H. Murray and Daniel G. Valles for Defendant and

Respondent.

Gil Griffin sued his employer, Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

(Quest), alleging common law and Fair Employment and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.