People v. Hechler CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 19, 2014C074623California709 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/19/14 P. v. Hechler CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COPY

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sutter) ----

THE PEOPLE, C074623

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF121802)

v.

GIL JAMES HECHLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Gil James Hechler has filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days has elapsed and we have received no communication from defendant. Finding no arguable error…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.