Gallardo-Lopez

Gallardo-Lopez v. Holder

Good Law
573 F. App'x 643
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 201408-70339California283 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Gumercindo Antonio Gallardo-Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evi dence factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We review de novo due process claims. Liu v. Holder, 640 F.3d 918, 930 (9th Cir.2011). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Gallardo-Lopez failed to show the government of Guatemala was or would be unwilling or unable to control the individuals who threatened him. See Castro-Perez v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1069, 1072 (9th Cir.2005). Thus, Gallardo-Lopez’s asylum claim fails.

Because Gallardo-Lopez failed to meet the lower burden of proof for asylum, it follows that he has not met the higher standard for withholding of removal. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190 .

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.