United States v. Fred Hovey, III

Good Law
574 F. App'x 749
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 201413-50128California215 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Fred Hovey appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and the 120-month sentence for importation of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hove/s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Hovey has filed a pro se supplemental brief. The government has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the basis of the appellate waiver in the parties’ plea agreement and has advised the court that it does not intend to file an answering brief.

Hovey has waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009). We, accordingly, grant the government’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988 .

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.