Osterland

Osterland v. Bridge CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 2014F066333California7,179 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gomes, J.

Filed 5/21/14 Osterland v. Bridge CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

CHARYL-LYNN OSTERLAND,

F066333

Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 04FL0498) v.

MICHAEL BRIDGE, OPINION Appellant.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Kings County. Robert S. Burns, Judge. Simoes Law Office, Joseph M. Simoes; Michael Bridge, in pro. per., for Appellant. Tritt & Tritt and James F. Tritt for Respondent. -ooOoo- Michael Bridge appeals from family court orders which denied his request to change custody of his eight-year-old son, modified the visitation schedule between himself and his former wife, Charyl-Lynn Osterland, and denied his request to appoint a psychological expert pursuant to Evidence Code section 730. Bridge argues the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.