Marriage of Shao and Wang CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 2014H037820California880 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Ms. Shao’s notice of appeal identifies a number of orders she attempts to appeal. She lists the orders after hearing for July 22, 2011, October 31, 2011 and November 21, 2011. However, July 22, 2011 was the date of the hearing, and the order

1 This statement of the facts and case is derived from Ms. Shao’s account in her brief. She does not cite to any documents in the record to support these facts. 2 At the time of the agreement, Ms. Shao and Mr. Wang had a son, who was 14, and a daughter, who was three. 3 April 21, 2011 is the beginning of the clerk’s transcript in this appeal. 2 after hearing was filed on October 31, 2011. She also lists oral orders made by the court on October 31, 2011 and November 21, 2011; however, the record on appeal does not contain reporter’s transcripts for those dates. Our review of the record reveals two written orders that coincide with Ms. Shao’s notice of appeal. The first is the order after hearing that occurred on July 22, 2011 and was filed on October 31, 2011. The second order was filed on January 25, 2012, following a hearing on November 21, 2011. October 31, 2011 Order In this order, the court continued the supervised visitation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.